Instructional delivery has become vibrant and interesting for learners and instructors (Kirschner, Sweller and Clark, 2006). Technology has made it possible for instructors to use audio, video, graphics and programming software in the teaching field. Comparison of current technological advancement with the past indicates a leap forward in instructional delivery and its application to the learning process (Jay, 1999). In this week’s discussion, we were ask to reflect back on our previous multimedia projects and how they can be integrated to fulfill the diverse levels of the learning process. It was shown by Pam in her Scratch project that students can apply programming to their learning to aid in the memorization rather than remote and drill kill methods of remembering key components of various topics. On the other hand, Rachel shared her video project which allowed students to transcend to “active learners” as students applied the concepts learned by becoming the author/producer of their own videos. Stephanie used the podcast to allow students to reflect which in turn led to pre-writing into their description of their culture.
Article
Cherney, I. D. (2008).
The effects of active learning on students' memories for course content. Active
Learning In Higher Education, 9(2),
152-171. doi:10.1177/1469787408090841
As a look back at the questions and
discussions on the self-test, I cannot help but to wonder, are we as educators “teaching
the test”. Which leads to my first
question?
- Given the advancements in technology (audio, video, graphics and programming software), Do you think there has been an increase in “discovery learning” vs. “direct instruction”?
- Should there be more discovery learning, direction instruction, or a balance between the two methods?
References:
Jay S. B (1999). Educational
computing in the schools: technology, communication, and literacy. New York: Haworth
Press.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. (2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does
not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery,
problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational
Psychologist 41 (2) 75-86